Sovereignty will not compete in the Preakness Stakes this Saturday, opting to skip the race two weeks after winning the Kentucky Derby. Owners and trainer Bill Mott decided against a Triple Crown pursuit due to the quick turnaround, marking the second time in four years that a Derby winner has missed the Preakness for this reason. This trend has prompted renewed discussions about the Triple Crown’s scheduling, with proposals ranging from extending the intervals between races to incentivizing participation in all three events.
Many in the racing community believe the traditional two-week schedule feels outdated, particularly as elite horses now generally race less frequently to minimize wear and tear and enhance performance. Hall of Fame jockey Jerry Bailey expressed concern about the current state of the Preakness, noting that it used to be standard for Derby winners to compete in the middle leg—a shift that raises questions about the overall competitiveness of the series.
Notable trainers like Steve Asmussen emphasize the challenge of the Triple Crown, debating whether altering its structure might dilute its significance. While some trainers continue to run Derby horses in the Preakness, others are increasingly hesitant due to the risks involved. Mark Casse articulated the importance of attracting top horses to maintain the sport’s integrity.
The historical context underscores a growing divide between tradition and modern practices specific to equine care and racing logistics. As the racing landscape evolves, the future of the Triple Crown remains a contentious topic, with many advocating for change to ensure its continued relevance and excitement.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
