Court documents released on Tuesday revealed little about Prince Harry’s entrance to the U.S. Federal officials argued that releasing detailed records would lead to “harm” and “harassment” for the royal. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, had filed a Freedom of Information Act request to learn more about Harry’s move to America. The group wanted to know if Harry had addressed issues related to past drug use before relocating to his new home near Santa Barbara with his wife, Meghan Markle.
The heavily redacted documents indicated that the privacy interests of Harry outweighed the public interest in revealing details about his immigration status. The Chief FOIA officer for the Department of Homeland Security stated that releasing Harry’s exact status could subject him to harassment and unwanted media attention. The Heritage Foundation sought to determine if Harry had received special treatment during the application process, especially after his memoir revealed past drug use.
In his memoir, Harry admitted to using cocaine and other drugs, acknowledging that he had consumed cocaine during a hunting weekend. While admitting to drug use may not prevent someone from entering the U.S., lying about it during the application process could result in deportation. The Heritage Foundation emphasized the importance of truthful disclosure on immigration forms, as lying could have serious consequences.
Overall, the court documents highlighted concerns about protecting Harry’s privacy and preventing potential harm and harassment if his immigration status were revealed. The Heritage Foundation’s efforts to uncover information about Harry’s move to the U.S. were met with redacted records and limited insights into his immigration process.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
